can allow the feature Always Encrypted of the SQL Server 2016 is
through writing the sequence, and after that, all data-access is
secured, no further programming required. As this is an association
sequence establishment, it’s allowed in every ORM out there out of
the box. That’s of course not the issue. The issue is including
more power over this feature to the designer composing rule which
focuses SQL Server 2016.
in Dot Net 4.6, the SqlClient API provides a way to specify when and
when not to secure using SQL Server 2016. This is done through an
establishing in SqlCommand’s constructor: you can specify a
SqlCommandColumnEncryptionSetting value which gives you power over
when to secure and when not to secure, which could significantly
improve efficiency if you just partially secure your catalog.
something odd, though: Although SqlCommand has a residence for this,
ColumnEncryptionSetting, it’s read-only. Its support varying is set
through the constructor. What is the reason behind the issue?
Nevertheless, your code is developing SqlCommand circumstances
straight, you can’t set the establishing for a given SqlCommand
instance: if you use DbProviderFactory, and most ORMs do, or if you
use CreateCommand() on the associated object, you can’t set the
setting. You can only set it if you straight use the constructor.
at this, somewhat really developed SqlCommand API, it can be wondered
that there’s a problem with this API, where can the reviews be
given so they can fix it. They couldn’t be responsive to that. With
an item you buy from a resource, you can do to that vendor’s
assistance direction, ask them what they think should be done to get
this settled and you gradually achieve a summary, but here, there is
basically no clue.
the most growth regarding Dot Net within Microsoft depends on upon
that, and a lot of air time is given to that on GitHub, blog posts
etc. But .NET complete, e.g. v4.6.2, where do you go with a problem
like this? Connect? Email someone within Microsoft , expecting
they’ll direct it to some individual that won’t remove it right
away and look at it? About, Link, there will be a lack: no way in
terrible am invest another second of your energy on the earth in that
low-quality program. Not only does the .NET group does not respond to
any problems there, they still have some beginning problems there
which are decades of age and no-one concerns to response them. It’s
like composing the problem into some written text information file
and never look at it again, the same outcome.
emailing someone within Microsoft: that might perform, but it also
might not. It can be known that some individuals within Microsoft
organization and it can be pretty sure that they’ll at least look
at the e-mail, but it’s an exotic way to provide feedback: here we
have a mega-corporation that creates immeasurable money each 30 days,
says to be a designer targeted organization and you have to e-mail
your query to some worker and desire to get answers? How screwed up
my technological problem with SqlCommand is not something everyone
will run into. That’s also not the factor. The factor is: if
there’s a problem with the .NET BCL/API, there should be a specific
direction to the groups operating on this codebase to provide them
reviews, review problems and get factors set. Nowadays there’s
none. Oh of course, if factors relevant to .NET Primary pop up, we
can begin a problem on GitHub and begin the discussion there, but
this isn’t relevant to .NET Core: SqlClient on .NET core doesn’t
contain any security relevant code , so this matter is out of the
opportunity for .NET
seriously has to get factors set in this place. We .NET designers now
have no way to provide reviews to them regarding APIs we have to
perform with every day. It’s not maintainable nor efficient. They
don’t need the current e-mail deal with of the SqlClient group,
they need a publicly available program where they can data file
problems and Microsoft organization can react quickly to them so they
can tell their customers and customers why factors are the way they
are. Which is how we do factors in the ISV world: give assistance to
our spending customers easily and completely so they can help their
customers easily and completely.
know, as experts. You can also learn .net through the .net training
institutes in Pune to make your profession in this field.
.NET training and placement reviews, please do visit CRB
Microsoft’s Dot Net Core Is The Future Of Its Development Platform?
13 Free .NET Development Tools